Skip to main content

In the inventory I would like to see all my finish under the same product

Expect of this in my Collection: How about Just one and under it a List WTR150 - CF - Qty: 1 CRU 178 - NF - Qty: 1 So you have on one look, how many of there card on me 🙂

Coz a lot of Cards have massiv Reprint in FaB. Like the Tunic. WTR A, WTR U, CRU F. CRU U. FAB GF. FAB EA. 1HPBL (GER,FR, Spain,) 1HP WL EVO

17 comments

This request was merged into another request

Comments17

  • Julie Le Soymier

    Team•

    Dec 18, 2025

    Hi @puksham
    Sorry for the late answer, we have actually something we’ll work on to answer this problem, it’s here in our roadmap if you want to upvote :) 📋 Complete list with "any" cards (finishes, expansion, condition, language,...)

  • Julie Le Soymier

    Team•

    Dec 18, 2025

    •

    Merged request

    •

    18 votes

    📋 Complete list with "any" cards (finishes, expansion, condition, language,...)

    • doug

      •

      Nov 11, 2025

      •

      Merged request

      •

      2 votes

      Option to consider all variants of a card in list

      I’m using the list function to figure out which cards I have, vs cards I need to complete a deck, and what that cost would be. It would be nice if there were an option to consider all version of a card to fill a needed spot. For instance. I need 6 copper cogs, I don’t care if they are rainbow foil, cold foil or normal, I want everything in my collection to count towards the need in this case. It would be nice as a toggle.

      • Julie Le Soymier

        Team•

        Jul 9, 2025

        Hey @doug
        Thanks for the feedback it’s really clear, I completely understand the need. We will do a rework of the list but it’s not going to be live soon, we’ll keep you posted ;)

      • gundi07

        •

        Aug 7, 2025

        To take this even further it would also be great if it took different languages or even sets into account.

    • gundi07

      •

      Nov 11, 2025

      •

      Merged request

      •

      3 votes

      Be able to pick the completion by "any languages" in the list

      It would be nice to have a feature to make lists independent of language, sets or card versions (standard/foil). For example I want to track if I own a playset of every mechanical different card. For example: I want to track if I own four copies of card XYZ which is available in multiple sets and multiple languages. I have one copy in german of set 1 and one copy in english of set 2. It would be nice if those could be merged into a single list entry which says that I am missing two copies.

    • dizzt

      •

      Nov 11, 2025

      •

      Merged request

      •

      1 vote

      Account for quantity without regarding version

      I want to have a playset of every card (3 copies), but I don’t care if I have 2 standard an 1 foil. I would like to have a item in the list that track both in my inventory

    • matthew

      •

      Nov 21, 2025

      •

      Merged request

      •

      1 vote

      Mixed Collection "standard & foil" - 1x mixed to complete the set

      I collect the mixed set, containing both standard and foil cards. My goal is to have all the cards in the collection. If I find foil cards that I don't have in my collection, I replace the standard copy with the foil one, but the important thing is that the set has all the cards (both standard and foil).

      This option cannot be included in lists.

      • Julie Le Soymier

        Team•

        Nov 2, 2025

        Hi @matthew
        Thanks for your feedback, If I understand you want to be able to complete a master no matter if it’s standard or foil, correct?
        Or do you want to collection Standard and Foil cards ?

        • matthew

          •

          Nov 10, 2025

          Correctly, I collect the cards to finish the set, I don't care if they're foil or not, the important thing is that I have them all from that set. Of course I prefer those foils, but it's important that it has 204/204

    • outlaw15

      •

      Nov 21, 2025

      •

      Merged request

      •

      1 vote

      Foil Agnostic flag

      It would be very helpful to have the lists have a flag to treat foils and non-foils the same or not. If I am making a list to determine if I have a playset of a given card, I would like to count all versions of a game piece towards that total sometimes. If I could set this per-list it would be ideal

    • skyrak

      •

      Dec 16, 2025

      •

      Merged request

      •

      2 votes

      Bad filter and quantity issue

      Hi, you made an awesome job with your collection tracker website. I found some issue that i would like to address.

      When you filter with unco/common with quantity from 1 to 2, some cards show properly with foil / non-foil but some other only shows either foil or non-foil so its hard to know if i have my playset or not. I think both foil and non-foil should show under the same picture but you could see this in the picture:

      1x foil

      2x standard

      Total = 3

      So if i filter by cards less than 3, this card would not show as i have a playset of these without checking if its foil or not.

      This way you easely know if you have your playset. But still keep the filter Foil if i want to only show my foils and get a playset of them.

      Also, i cant put Quantity to 0 to see which card i dont own in my collection that i need to buy. You could only put the filter Less then 1 to 12+, this would include automatically the quantity 0.

      Thanks :)

      • vaultborn

        •

        Dec 15, 2025

        Hi, to clarify things. Are you talking about Inventory or Lists? And what Game?

      • Julie Le Soymier

        Team•

        Dec 16, 2025

        Hey @skyrak
        Thanks for your feedback 🙏
        I understand your need we actually have a ticket on our roadmap for this 📋 Complete list with "any" cards (finishes, expansion, condition, language,...) It’s not a bug, it’s a feature because our system differentiate every variation of a card. We need to improve this system for sure and your comment confirms even more that we need to go in this direction, thank you!